The Build vs. Buy Conundrum for CI/CD Pipeline Monitoring: How to Get Beyond It

Although most firms have found a middle ground between the rival development and operations tribes thanks to DevOps, promoting CI/CD methods and achieving continuous improvements still calls for a high degree of skill. Businesses frequently find it difficult to get the full benefits of a CI/CD system.

Choosing the appropriate technology for pipeline monitoring is not easy, even though CI/CD pipeline monitoring can assist in evaluating the performance and health of pipelines. They must also decide which CI/CD monitoring tools to purchase, posing the classic build vs. buy conundrum.

Managing the CI/CD Toolset's Constant Evolution

The CI/CD market is crowded with competitors, and each firm has a unique set of tools. It's not reasonable to assume, though, that CI/CD implementation is a one-time task. As part of their CI/CD journey, organizations must upgrade or implement new platforms and tools while also getting rid of outdated ones in order to continue the "shift left" and boost automation.

Jenkins is the most well-known and established tool for continuous integration, with a market share of over 50%. However, people that have worked on Jenkins are aware of how difficult it is to maintain and support. Organizations frequently find it difficult to maintain the pace and caliber of software delivery as more teams are added to Jenkins.

The buy strategy, as opposed to the create approach, gives you the chance to rely on the experience of commercial suppliers who provide pre-made apps and tailored monitoring solutions. This method not only prevents companies from having to start from scratch, but it also makes it simple for them to implement best practices.

Additionally, it saves time and effort in a variety of technical concerns that can cause indecision. For their CI/CD configuration, organizations can also do proof-of-concepts (POCs) and speak with the suppliers to determine which monitoring solution is optimal.